Fortune 500 List

Come here to talk about topics that are not related to development, or even Kansas City.
User avatar
AllThingsKC
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9369
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Kansas City, Missouri (Downtown)
Contact:

Fortune 500 List

Post by AllThingsKC »

H&R Block has dropped off the Fortune 500 list, which means that NO Missouri-side companies are on the list, and 3 Kansas-side companies (Sprint, Embarq, and YRC Worldwide) stay on the list.


http://www.kansascity.com/382/story/584983.html
KC is the way to be!
ignatius
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 2:42 pm
Location: Midtown/Downtown
Contact:

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by ignatius »

Ten years ago or so, a $2B company would be in the F500.  Now a $4B company doesn't qualify.  Partly, it's a result of mergers of many fairly large companies into larger ones.  But when one in KC merges, it usually loses the HQ to somewhere else.
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10219
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by Highlander »

ignatius wrote: Ten years ago or so, a $2B company would be in the F500.  Now a $4B company doesn't qualify.  Partly, it's a result of mergers of many fairly large companies into larger ones.  But when one in KC merges, it usually loses the HQ to somewhere else.
The price of oil has driven up the asset base of a lot of smaller regional oil companies pushing them into the Fortune 500 at the expense of others.  Houston, OKC and picked up several additional Fortunate 500 companies in the last year, sometimes without adding an employee. 
zonk
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:07 pm
Location: downtown

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by zonk »

AllThingsKC wrote: H&R Block has dropped off the Fortune 500 list, which means that NO Missouri-side companies are on the list, and 3 Kansas-side companies (Sprint, Embarq, and YRC Worldwide) stay on the list.
http://www.kansascity.com/382/story/584983.html
Just another reason why Kansas Kicks ASS!!!!!!    :D/
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by dangerboy »

The three Joco companies won't be on their much longer.  Sprint seems destined to be acquired.  Embarq had a declining landline business.  Yellow Freight take it real hard when rising oil kills the trucking sector.

Maybe KC Southern can ride rail resurgence into the 500.
NDTeve
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4649
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:55 pm

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by NDTeve »

While Garmin slides in as well.  :D
"Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first."
- Mark Twain
Maitre D
The Quiet Chair
The Quiet Chair
Posts: 14070
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Sunny Johnson County

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by Maitre D »

dangerboy wrote: Yellow Freight take it real hard when rising oil kills the trucking sector.

Yes.  Goods will no longer be shipped across the country.   They will magically appear on your doorstep, a la the Stork delivering your newborns.
[img width=472 height=40]http://media.kansascity.com/images/champions_blue.gif[/img]

"For 15 years...KU won every time. There was no rivalry" - Frank Martin
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

Maitre D wrote:
Yes.  Goods will no longer be shipped across the country.   They will magically appear on your doorstep, a la the Stork delivering your newborns.
Yeah - I keep wondering about that everytime they run one of these news stories about heartbreaking conditions for the truckers.  Everything else remotely related to fuel cost is going through rapid inflation, so why aren't the truckers just passing the fuel costs along to their customers?  They make it out like these folks are loosing money getting behind the wheel - well how about raising the price.  I am sure there are some folks bound to contract prices but surely that can't be everything. 
Maitre D
The Quiet Chair
The Quiet Chair
Posts: 14070
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Sunny Johnson County

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by Maitre D »

LenexatoKCMO wrote: Yeah - I keep wondering about that everytime they run one of these news stories about heartbreaking conditions for the truckers.  Everything else remotely related to fuel cost is going through rapid inflation, so why aren't the truckers just passing the fuel costs along to their customers?  They make it out like these folks are loosing money getting behind the wheel - well how about raising the price.  I am sure there are some folks bound to contract prices but surely that can't be everything. 
They lost 3% of their revenue year-over-year, as of Dec 31, 2007.   Their stock price is in the tank now as well: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=YRCW&t=5y


Nevertheless, as you pointed out:  Truckers, as economic intermediaries, merely pass along costs.   They're required by the all consumers (just like your local gas company or electric company is), and required products have very elastic demand.   


At a 9B/yr firm, they're not leaving the F500 anytime soon despite Danger's mad ranting.
[img width=472 height=40]http://media.kansascity.com/images/champions_blue.gif[/img]

"For 15 years...KU won every time. There was no rivalry" - Frank Martin
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10219
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by Highlander »

NDTeve wrote: While Garmin slides in as well.  :D
Garmin may be in too much of a niche industry to ever grow into a fortune 500 company. 
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

Highlander wrote: Garmin may be in too much of a niche industry to ever grow into a fortune 500 company. 
Getting effectively locked out of the broader geo-data market with the sale of NavTeq and TeleAtlas to rivals will prove to be a long term problem for Garmin's potential. 
aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12657
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by aknowledgeableperson »

Highlander wrote: Garmin may be in too much of a niche industry to ever grow into a fortune 500 company. 
True, but from what I have heard it is a company that is debt free and cash rich.  And it is still a very young company.  Given the price of stock for many companies they could go into the expansion mode and start diversifing and grow that way (much like most big companies).

When I was young we always felt it was farfetched that Dick Tracy had a wristwatch that had video and audio capabilities.  Who knows, in 5 or 10 years that might actually happen with even more capabilities.  And Garmin could be in the forefront of that development or any other development that exists only in people's minds at this time.
I may be right.  I may be wrong.  But there is a lot of gray area in-between.
ignatius
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 2:42 pm
Location: Midtown/Downtown
Contact:

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by ignatius »

I'd predict that Garmin will continue to grow but not as rapidly as the past.  They'll have a challenge maintaining the market share for the consumer products.  The GPS market as a whole will grow but their market share probably won't as anyone could now license the maps and create a GPS app.  With cellphones now offering navigation with near realtime map/POS updates, Garmin will have a challenge.  The air/boating GPS market isn't big enough to grow them to an F500 company.  They could end up merging with Magellen and/or someone like Dash down the road though.  Merging will probably be the only way for them to hit F500, or they buy one of the major mapping sources.  But I could be wrong as they have become a $3B company very rapidly.
NDTeve
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4649
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:55 pm

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by NDTeve »

ignatius wrote: But I could be wrong as they have become a $3B company very rapidly.
This is why I have confidence in them. I think they have the brains to diversify their product enough to be ahead of the curve.
"Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first."
- Mark Twain
ignatius
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 2:42 pm
Location: Midtown/Downtown
Contact:

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by ignatius »

Check this out. In 1992 you only needed to be a $500m company (revenues) to be in the F500..
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/ ... 2/401.html

Today you have to be at $4.6B to make the list.
User avatar
Joemoney
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1006
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by Joemoney »

Omaha has 4, including the 11th largest company, yet we have 2/5ths the population.  http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/ ... es/NE.html

We also have the richest man in the world.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/10/bil ... _C0R3.html

In your face, KC.
RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
User avatar
schugg
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3279
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:02 am
Location: kcmo
Contact:

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by schugg »

Joemoney wrote: Omaha has 4, including the 11th largest company, yet we have 2/5ths the population.  http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/ ... es/NE.html

We also have the richest man in the world.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/10/bil ... _C0R3.html

In your face, KC.
I wonder how many concerts  KC has stolen from omaha since the sprint center has opened. HA!
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by dangerboy »

Joemoney wrote: Omaha has 4, including the 11th largest company, yet we have 2/5ths the population.  http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/ ... es/NE.html

We also have the richest man in the world.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/10/bil ... _C0R3.html

In your face, KC.
Now you just need your own InterWeb forum to talk about your own city.
User avatar
Cyclops
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 835
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: KC by day. Stilwell, KS by night

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by Cyclops »

Joemoney wrote: In your face, KC.
Wow! That really hurt... I'm moving!
the only thing for sure is change.
User avatar
Gretz
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Union Hill

Re: Fortune 500 List

Post by Gretz »

ignatius wrote: I'd predict that Garmin will continue to grow but not as rapidly as the past.  They'll have a challenge maintaining the market share for the consumer products.  The GPS market as a whole will grow but their market share probably won't as anyone could now license the maps and create a GPS app.  With cellphones now offering navigation with near realtime map/POS updates, Garmin will have a challenge.  The air/boating GPS market isn't big enough to grow them to an F500 company.  They could end up merging with Magellen and/or someone like Dash down the road though.  Merging will probably be the only way for them to hit F500, or they buy one of the major mapping sources.  But I could be wrong as they have become a $3B company very rapidly.
Didn't I read something recently about Garmin teaming up with a handset maker (believe it was Nokia or maybe Motorola)?  They and TomTom both are very aware of their soon to decline non-integrated device sales and are casting about frantically to develop new products and markets.  Garmin is also teaming up with someone to integrate their technology into car navigation/radio/wireless broadband super-systems, I know.  Garmin's figures, inventories and even explicit statements indicate that they expect stand alone navigation device sales to begin to decline fairly dramatically soon, but hopefully their other product lines can keep their cash-flows growing.  I certainly don't anticipate a 50% jump in revenues that would put them into the fortune 500 anytime soon though.
Post Reply