You are right about Wyandotte County being insular. But I think you underestimate the number of people who would benefit there from a better mass transit plan. I didn't necessarily state it would be light rail. I meant a more integrated mass transit plan. Wyandotte County is already tied into the KCATA better than Johnson County is, with their separate "The Jo" system.Highlander wrote: I really wonder why anyone would think that. I would bet a mass transit initiative in JoCo would garner twice the percentage points in votes than one in Wyandotte County. Wyandotte County was not even in the ballpark on the bistate initiatives and they have shown no reason to believe they are either willing to cooperate with the metro or are in any stretch of the imagination even slightly progressive. The population of Wyandotte county can be extremely insular. I do not think a light rail initiative would necassarily pass in JoCo either but it would sure do better there than in Wyandotte County.
I'm talking about the fact there are probably more low-income people in Wyandotte County who would benefit from better mass transit. Perhaps there might be a feeder light rail line that ran from Union Station to downtown KCKS, and then would feed out from there using other methods of transport. It might be extending hours of service and adding more routes. I think downtown KCKS could benefit a great deal though from a feeder light rail line that connects to the KCMO lines.
I just don't see light rail working as well in Johnson County, or that people there are as inclined to use it to get around Johnson County. Some would take it into work in downtown KCMO, but a commuter rail line could serve that same purpose.
I also see Johnson County being more inclined to develop their own, separate mass transit system, and not so inclined to participate in one being developed by KCMO. My mind is open though and I'm more than happy to be surprised by Johnson Countians joining in a Metro-wide transit plan.