Proposed reduction in KCATA service

Transportation topics in KC
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17186
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Proposed reduction in KCATA service

Post by GRID »

I still don't like this tax.

People are going to expect more and when they don't see a lot of improvements to the transit system, they will fail future transit taxes.

Speaking of transit taxes, why are we not voting on a larger system tax now that includes money for the existing system plus massive upgrades?

Yael Says in the Star today that we should be ready for the smart moves tax in 2008. 2008???? In 2008 we will vote to improve our bus system to the level of service that most cities had in 1985 and no rail.

Maybe I will feel better when the first phase of BRT opens.
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Proposed reduction in KCATA service

Post by dangerboy »

GRID wrote:Speaking of transit taxes, why are we not voting on a larger system tax now that includes money for the existing system plus massive upgrades?

Yael Says in the Star today that we should be ready for the smart moves tax in 2008. 2008???? In 2008 we will vote to improve our bus system to the level of service that most cities had in 1985 and no rail.
Because it will take that long to get a new bi-state compact setup. We are looking at probably two years to debate it in both state legislatures, then another year to get it approved by Congress, then one more year to get it on the ballot in all five counties.
User avatar
tat2kc
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4196
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: freighthouse district
Contact:

Re: Proposed reduction in KCATA service

Post by tat2kc »

Doesn't St. Louis have a bi-state compact with Illinois regarding public transportation? How can we find out the steps that they went through to get their system up and running?

The metro needs to create a brand new regional, bi-state transortation authority, with a metro-wide tax. It needs to have representatives from those areas that are served by public transportation. As it is now, the ATA has reps from areas that do not contribute tax money, and does not have ATA service. The metro, the Bus (kck) and the JO is a dumb way to provide public transporation to this area. We don't need 3 different public transportation entities in one metro area. The public transporation entities in the KC area is a good example of cross state/cross county rivalry and bickering we need to get over.
Are you sure we're talking about the same God here, because yours sounds kind of like a dick.
Post Reply