General Amtrak Discussion

Transportation topics in KC
User avatar
FangKC
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12162
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby FangKC » Mon May 02, 2016 1:50 am

We need to stop thinking in terms of bringing high-speed rail linking the entire country across vast states. Instead, we should look at cities, and regional economies, since they are the largest generators of GDP and jobs. The approach should look to link urban centers to each other where it would be appropriate because of economic activity.

User avatar
beautyfromashes
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3715
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby beautyfromashes » Mon May 02, 2016 8:56 am

KC and St. Louis?

flyingember
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5966
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby flyingember » Mon May 02, 2016 9:25 am

FangKC wrote:We need to stop thinking in terms of bringing high-speed rail linking the entire country across vast states. Instead, we should look at cities, and regional economies, since they are the largest generators of GDP and jobs. The approach should look to link urban centers to each other where it would be appropriate because of economic activity.


a large part of our regional economy is long-distance transport (rail, trucking).

So wouldn't long distance links be what we would need for KC?

bobbyhawks
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3729
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby bobbyhawks » Mon May 02, 2016 11:17 am

beautyfromashes wrote:KC and St. Louis?

I just think this is such a naturally great idea for a state with metros that are spread out like Missouri, but it is ambitious, expensive, and different from what we are used to doing, so nobody is willing to risk being the one proposing truly modern HSR across the state. KC and STL are just a little bit closer together than Tokyo and Kyoto, and the Tokyo to Kyoto bullet train takes around 2.5 hours with multiple stops along the way. A wifi enabled 2 to 2.5 hour train ride would really make KC and STL seem closer together and allow them to exist as a single economic engine. It could also do wonders for Columbia as folks could realistically commute to work in either KC or STL from there. It would cost a lot of money, but Missouri would have a backbone that only a few other states are even considering, and there are a lot of jobs tied to such a massive effort, both in the short term and the long term.

aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12184
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby aknowledgeableperson » Mon May 02, 2016 11:50 am

If either KC or StL metro areas had a population of almost 38 million it might make sense.

bobbyhawks
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3729
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby bobbyhawks » Mon May 02, 2016 3:03 pm

aknowledgeableperson wrote:If either KC or StL metro areas had a population of almost 38 million it might make sense.

And if the Shinkansen was a pioneering new technology that had just been built in a dense country lacking in rail options, that comparison would make sense. Tokyo/Kyoto was only used because it is a distance that I was aware of that was similar to KC to STL. There are a lot of equivalent systems in other countries, but it is worth noting that the Japanese first conceived of and built the Shinkansen in the late 1950s and into the early 1960s. The population argument is one certainly worth making, and I agree we have a very different footprint than most nations considering HSR, but I'd hope we are at least capable of catching up to what they were doing in the 80s or 90s.

User avatar
ldai_phs
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby ldai_phs » Mon May 02, 2016 3:17 pm

aknowledgeableperson wrote:If either KC or StL metro areas had a population of almost 38 million it might make sense.

A Train only has to travel 110mph to be considered high speed. This is already being worked on between Chicago and STL over Union Pacific Tracks. Adding KC would be a natural next phase and wouldn't be too expensive either.

pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby pash » Mon May 02, 2016 4:03 pm

.
Last edited by pash on Tue Feb 14, 2017 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 15613
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby DaveKCMO » Mon May 02, 2016 4:06 pm

ldai_phs wrote:
aknowledgeableperson wrote:If either KC or StL metro areas had a population of almost 38 million it might make sense.

A Train only has to travel 110mph to be considered high speed. This is already being worked on between Chicago and STL over Union Pacific Tracks. Adding KC would be a natural next phase and wouldn't be too expensive either.


CHI-STL high speed service was budgeted at $1.1 billion.

bobbyhawks
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3729
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby bobbyhawks » Wed May 04, 2016 10:03 am

DaveKCMO wrote:
ldai_phs wrote:
aknowledgeableperson wrote:If either KC or StL metro areas had a population of almost 38 million it might make sense.

A Train only has to travel 110mph to be considered high speed. This is already being worked on between Chicago and STL over Union Pacific Tracks. Adding KC would be a natural next phase and wouldn't be too expensive either.


CHI-STL high speed service was budgeted at $1.1 billion.

Perhaps we can coerce some Missouri-roots conservative with gobs of money into building such a connector through reverse psychology. Maybe have the Dems offer up bogus bills with no chance of passing that would prevent a private railroad or privately operated rail service from connecting STL and KC (it would fit right in with other bills designed to protect things that don't need protecting). I mean, one of the main characters in Atlas Shrugged could do it; how come modern libertarians and Randians are such whiny little bitches they can't get something magnificent done without waiting for the government to create the opportunity for them? We can't rely on Elon Musk for everything.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 15613
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby DaveKCMO » Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:03 pm

renovated amtrak interiors should all be complete by may 2018, including the missouri ones (but not the superliners used on the southwest chief). here's what they'll look like:

Image

separately, there's finally a deal for brand NEW equipment. arrival date TBD.

https://www.midwesthsr.org/new-midwest- ... ens-design

bobbyhawks
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3729
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby bobbyhawks » Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:25 pm

That looks pretty nice. It's been a few years since I've ridden Amtrak, but do they have wifi on all routes yet? It doesn't look like the Southwest Chief does yet, which just boggles my mind.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 15613
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby DaveKCMO » Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:13 am

Almost all sleeping cars have Wi-Fi, but not coach. The rest of the “corridor” routes all have it.

bobbyhawks
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3729
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby bobbyhawks » Thu Nov 16, 2017 10:40 am

DaveKCMO wrote:Almost all sleeping cars have Wi-Fi, but not coach. The rest of the “corridor” routes all have it.

That is just insane to me. Keeping people occupied via wifi sounds like the #1 way to improve the customer perception of the long, slow hauls through Iowa with no or intermittent cell coverage.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 15613
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby DaveKCMO » Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:35 am

bobbyhawks wrote:
DaveKCMO wrote:Almost all sleeping cars have Wi-Fi, but not coach. The rest of the “corridor” routes all have it.

That is just insane to me. Keeping people occupied via wifi sounds like the #1 way to improve the customer perception of the long, slow hauls through Iowa with no or intermittent cell coverage.


Amtrak's WiFi system runs on cellular connections.

WoodDraw
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 902
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: General Amtrak Discussion

Postby WoodDraw » Thu Nov 16, 2017 6:18 pm

Yeah, even on the Missouri River runner wifi (cellular) coverage is average at best.


Return to “Kansas City Transportation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests