KCPowercat wrote:what's the link to that data? Weird they listed the STL number so detailed and all the other airports rounded to the 10th of a million.
I think this was originally posted on Urban STL.
STLguy1 wrote:STL Metro did not lose population. You are misinformed. The growth was slower but not negative.
KCFan wrote:STLguy1 wrote:STL Metro did not lose population. You are misinformed. The growth was slower but not negative.
Not according to the U.S. census.....the St. Louis metro dropped 1328 people.
grovester wrote:Agree on the squeaker, I think a lot of them want to have it both ways.
KCPowercat wrote:There is a pact of council that will vote the same way.....and I don't think they can get to 7 ..so when it comes down to it they won't want to be on the minority side.
KCPowercat wrote:I'm far from confident in that prediction
WoodDraw wrote:I'm assuming a lot just want to switch to burns and mac still. Much better for their political careers.
Users browsing this forum: kcjak and 4 guests