Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Transportation topics in KC
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16595
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by DaveKCMO » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:05 pm

aknowledgeableperson wrote:"DeJanes's garage, by the way, seems to have been built in 1996."

Surely the ATA knew of its existence since then. If so then why wait so long to take action? Why wait 20 years?
she's taken up more of their space since then.

User avatar
beautyfromashes
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4216
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by beautyfromashes » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:27 pm

^ She's like a pimp expanding her territory.

User avatar
im2kull
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by im2kull » Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:34 am

Wait, who erased my post about DeJanes (Where I posted the GIS property photos and gave out her contact info for those interested in personal injury lawyers for those injured by DeJanes structures crisscrossing public lands)??

pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by pash » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:01 am

.
Last edited by pash on Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

WoodDraw
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1293
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by WoodDraw » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:27 am

This obsession with DeJanes does seem a bit unhealthy. She's becoming a scooby doo villain with a bunch of fake detectives here.

"And we would have gotten away with it, if not for that rotten DeJanes!"

There's been a lawsuit filed and I'm sure maybe a few of you have tried to get local journalists involved. No one seems interested. Maybe it's time to settle the fuck down?

User avatar
taxi
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1570
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: North End
Contact:

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by taxi » Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:48 am

I think she's hot.

flyingember
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 6806
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by flyingember » Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:49 am

WoodDraw wrote:This obsession with DeJanes does seem a bit unhealthy. She's becoming a scooby doo villain with a bunch of fake detectives here.

"And we would have gotten away with it, if not for that rotten DeJanes!"

There's been a lawsuit filed and I'm sure maybe a few of you have tried to get local journalists involved. No one seems interested. Maybe it's time to settle the fuck down?
She's involved with about at least one anti-anything group in the city. This is just one piece of the whole picture.

Showing she has little respect for due process is like pointing out Sue Burke has an alley dock and yet complains about not being able to block the street any more.

It's all about lessening her moral standing on the subject. Something like "the KCATA had to sue her over improperly fencing in part of the cooridor she doesn't want trains on"

WoodDraw
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1293
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by WoodDraw » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:08 am

flyingember wrote:
WoodDraw wrote:This obsession with DeJanes does seem a bit unhealthy. She's becoming a scooby doo villain with a bunch of fake detectives here.

"And we would have gotten away with it, if not for that rotten DeJanes!"

There's been a lawsuit filed and I'm sure maybe a few of you have tried to get local journalists involved. No one seems interested. Maybe it's time to settle the fuck down?
She's involved with about at least one anti-anything group in the city. This is just one piece of the whole picture.

Showing she has little respect for due process is like pointing out Sue Burke has an alley dock and yet complains about not being able to block the street any more.

It's all about lessening her moral standing on the subject. Something like "the KCATA had to sue her over improperly fencing in part of the cooridor she doesn't want trains on"
Oh, I have no problem with that in context. And given a public campaign by her, I have no problem introducing it. Right now it all has just gotten a little boogeyman-ish, to put it lightly.

pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by pash » Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:57 pm

.
Last edited by pash on Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

WoodDraw
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1293
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by WoodDraw » Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:24 pm

You must be such an insufferable prick to know.

My point, as always, is that this is a message board of like 12 people that post regularly. You could quiz all of us and we could all tell you where she lives and the grave, grave laws she's broken.

If you feel so strongly about this, may I suggest writing Collison or the star or the pitch? Or you can continue to write screeds to the choir here, tell me to fuck off, and complain about the unnamed moderator. I leave that to you.

User avatar
grovester
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3715
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: KC Metro

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by grovester » Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:13 pm

If we'd only gotten rid of DeJanes way back when, we'd have a metro-wide transit system.

There will always be a DeJanes.

mean
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 10738
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:00 am
Location: Historic Northeast

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by mean » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:31 pm

I didn't remove the posts, but there is no question that posting that kind of stuff, especially in the context of railing against someone you feel has done wrong and gone unpunished, can easily be perceived--and has been perceived in many cases--as an invitation to harassment, at minimum. I probably would have left them up personally, the odds of some psycho rando stumbling across them seems astronomically small, but I get it.

User avatar
beautyfromashes
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4216
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by beautyfromashes » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:48 pm

Moderators used to temporarily ban posters. Happened to me a few times. It was deserved in most of the occasions but the posts were always worth it.

WoodDraw
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1293
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by WoodDraw » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:00 pm

Also, I'm not convinced that it is a good argument to make. What's the follow through here? Do we really want to antagonize all of brookside (and a good deal of waldo) by turning this into a thing? I bet many there will sympathize with her more than a bunch of internet people running oppo research on a niche message board.

The KC Star could easily end up running a story saying "Pro-streetcar advocates post private information of opponents, call for city to take back land." The pretentiousness of thinking everyone must and should agree with us is so dangerous.

User avatar
KCPowercat
Power & Light
Power & Light
Posts: 28648
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by KCPowercat » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:16 pm

WoodDraw wrote: this is a message board of like 12 people that post regularly
WoodDraw wrote: a niche message board.
okay, okay, we get it....it's not reddit.

User avatar
beautyfromashes
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4216
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by beautyfromashes » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:51 pm

Best way to remove her building is to work to replace it with a streetcar.

WoodDraw
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1293
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by WoodDraw » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:53 pm

KCPowercat wrote:
WoodDraw wrote: this is a message board of like 12 people that post regularly
WoodDraw wrote: a niche message board.
okay, okay, we get it....it's not reddit.
I'd like to live downtown, can afford about $700... Looking for a two bedroom with parking.

User avatar
KCPowercat
Power & Light
Power & Light
Posts: 28648
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by KCPowercat » Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:18 am

Lol

dnweava
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:03 pm

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by dnweava » Fri Sep 22, 2017 1:04 pm

WoodDraw wrote:
KCPowercat wrote:
WoodDraw wrote: this is a message board of like 12 people that post regularly
WoodDraw wrote: a niche message board.
okay, okay, we get it....it's not reddit.
I'd like to live downtown, can afford about $700... Looking for a two bedroom with parking.
I know this is a joke post. But you can get a 2 bed downtown in the 700s. Quality Hill towers for example is still cheap.

User avatar
im2kull
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by im2kull » Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:01 pm

WoodDraw wrote: The KC Star could easily end up running a story saying "Pro-streetcar advocates post private information of opponents, call for city to take back land." The pretentiousness of thinking everyone must and should agree with us is so dangerous.
What private information? It's all public.
http://www.sherrydejanes.com/

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Westp ... -94.591384

http://www.besmartkc.com/

http://maps.jacksongov.org/parcelviewer/

https://www.facebook.com/sdejanes

https://www.linkedin.com/in/sherrydejanes/

http://maps.jacksongov.org/PropertyRepo ... 0-0-00-000

Image
Image

https://www.dropbox.com/s/y7p84ger143flo1/1.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lstqemo0zuixppf/2.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ryiobab57wx6nit/3.jpg

Get real.

If she doesn't want anyone asked her questions about the public things she does, or who injured themselves on "her" property suing her for damages, then maybe she shouldn't have "her" property on top of city/public property while creating a fuss about the way the city uses it's own property. If she really doesn't expect anyone to criticize her or speak up about the violations of multiple laws and codes that she's so openly committing, then perhaps she shouldn't be such a hypocritical bitch. Let's stop blaming the gun here, and start holding the person pulling the trigger accountable.

Post Reply