KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Transportation topics in KC
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10146
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by Highlander »

GRID wrote: Well, I am already getting some solid feedback, here is the letter I wrote...
Commuter rail in KC is simply a waste of time and money. It won’t move enough people, it won’t create any sort of redevelopment opportunities and the KC area just isn’t large enough or congested enough to warrant commuter rail. KC has plenty of railroad right of ways, but they don’t enter the urban core in a way that makes it worthwhile. We need to use this right of way “combined with” building new right of way to create a first class rail transit system.
I do not know if I agree with this part.  Living in Europe, I see commuter rail working very well in cities much smaller than KC.  Every city over here is a rail hub and the work force for the city is collected from all the surrounding communities via what is essentially commuter rail (regularly scheduled passenger service).  While in Zurich (smaller than KC), I stayed in a town well outside of the city and commuted to the city via train.  Given parking and congestion and my unwillingness to rent a car, it was the only way to go.  Building light rail to serve the myriad of communities on KC's periphery would be prohibitively expense.

My company had an office in suburban London and I travelled out there on what is essentially commuter rail frequently.  In about 15-20 miles, the train made about 6-7 stops at stations in suburban cities along the way.  The right-of-way was not along commercial/residential streets but through areas much like the RR tracks in KC traverse.  It took anywhere between 30-40 minutes to get into the city of London depending on the time of the day.  I really do not see this being a problem as long as the service is frequent enough.  Time and convenience are of course important but there's one thing you seem to be forgetting; good public transportation can allow a family to reduce the number of cars they need from 2 to 1.  Here in the UK, I put up with a lot of inconvenience for the savings offered by having only one car.     
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by DaveKCMO »

rxlexi wrote: yeah go get 'em Grid.  I agree with just about every aspect of your plan, and I only wish someone such as yourself was involved in Funk's regional planning.  I'm sure there are many intelligent, passionate folks behind our light-rail efforts, but you (and DaveKCMO, from what it sounds like) really need to be a part of this process.  I would love to see half of what you're discussing implemented, and kudos on the thoughtful communication and colorful, readable maps!
thanks! i attended all but one of the downtown workshops, as well as the initial workshop when the corridor was defined. i like to think that i'm working within the process, as well talking about it externally.

but, alas, i got no maps skillz. :(
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by KCMax »

Highlander wrote: I do not know if I agree with this part.  Living in Europe, I see commuter rail working very well in cities much smaller than KC. 
I do not think you can compare European culture with American, let alone Kansas City culture. The gas prices are much different, cities are situated much differently, and the culture is much different.
SAVE THE PLAZA - FROM ZOMBIES! Find out how at:

http://twitter.com/TheKCRag
shaffe
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2420
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 2:51 pm
Contact:

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by shaffe »

so are you going to share with us some of your feedback, grid?
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10146
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by Highlander »

KCMax wrote: I do not think you can compare European culture with American, let alone Kansas City culture. The gas prices are much different, cities are situated much differently, and the culture is much different.
There are differences and similarities.  In Europe, there is much more hassle and expense with driving and parking, that's the big difference and the suburban cities are all pretty dense themselves.  Whether it would work or not in KC depends on the level of service.  If the trains are too infrequent to allow for flexibility and too slow, it won't be able to compete.  As far as speed is concerned, the more tortuious route that commuter rail would follow would be balanced by fewer stops en route.  The cost would be less because a large outlay of capital would not be needed as in the case of light rail. 

In Europe and in the US, the basic theme of people living in one town wanting to get to another remains the same.  While the obvious inconveniences relative to a car are going to be a problem in the US, commuter rail may allow a family to cut down on the number of cars they own and that would be a huge savings.     
enough
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 997
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:52 pm

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by enough »

commuter rail for kansas city -- at least on the missouri side -- is just not cost-effective.  the biggest barrier is covering the final six or seven miles into the center city. 

the mayor's proposal puts 56 percent of the miles and 36 percent of the dollars into commuter rail, which would likely not carry more than 2-3 percent of regional transit riders.  i have to wonder if the polling that he cites in support of his proposal conveyed that fact.

thinking long-term is critical, and i applaud grid's proposal.  we also need to be thinking about how we respond in the near term. 

buses aren't sexy, but they are far more cost-effective than rail, and the service can be put in place much quicker.  people who rely on transit every day are far more interested in transit *service* and far less interested in whether that service rides on rails.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by normalthings »

With the areas population expected to grow by some 600K in the next 20 years, increased public support for rail projects, and recent strong support for the airport, is now the time to revisit a legitimate light rail plan. Not a Chadtain Proposal. But an actual starter line. Peer cities like Nashville are building systems. Others are expanding existing systems.
In my unofficial polling, I’ve generally seen strong support for such a project. If we can show how the city is growing, how the city needs to grow, and what our peer cities are doing. I totally think that a starter system could pass(maybe not tomorrow or next year, but sometime in the next 5-7 years)
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by flyingember »

We have light rail. It's running downtown right now. This is an important distinction when we look at what we can do.

I like to use Houston because it has similarities and differences to KC
The red line has longer trains, have dedicated lanes and mostly wider stop spacing.
But the red line downtown has the same stop spacing as our streetcar.
They also have trains running mixed in traffic on the purple/green common segment downtown

To me the best system isn't to build a second system but to build a hybrid system and not worry about the name and work on speeding up what we have today.

Segments like Wornall and N. Oak absolutely need to be light rail styled. But there's no reason it shouldn't be part of the streetcar system to where someone could hop on the train near Ward Parkway Center and ride it towards Zona Rosa or vice versa.

About the only place I can see value in parallel track is to build additional lines N-S between Brush Creek and the river to provide options. A route that connects to the government district, Hospital Hill down Oak and Troost could be well placed
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by normalthings »

flyingember wrote:We have light rail. It's running downtown right now. This is an important distinction when we look at what we can do.

I like to use Houston because it has similarities and differences to KC
The red line has longer trains, have dedicated lanes and mostly wider stop spacing.
But the red line downtown has the same stop spacing as our streetcar.
They also have trains running mixed in traffic on the purple/green common segment downtown

To me the best system isn't to build a second system but to build a hybrid system and not worry about the name and work on speeding up what we have today.

Segments like Wornall and N. Oak absolutely need to be light rail styled. But there's no reason it shouldn't be part of the streetcar system to where someone could hop on the train near Ward Parkway Center and ride it towards Zona Rosa or vice versa.

About the only place I can see value in parallel track is to build additional lines N-S between Brush Creek and the river to provide options. A route that connects to the government district, Hospital Hill down Oak and Troost could be well placed
Something like Houston so that we can put together what we have already with new lines would be the goal. But, a more city/County wide approach will be needed to accelerate the build out. And I think the support may be there or is getting there
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by normalthings »

I heard today that the Chamber of Commerce is looking at an "AI Superhighway" as part of their transit initiative. Anyone else here something about this?
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2890
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by TheLastGentleman »

ldai_phs wrote:I heard today that the Chamber of Commerce is looking at an "AI Superhighway" as part of their transit initiative. Anyone else here something about this?
It sounds awesome but I don't know what it means.
tower
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:45 am
Location: Midtown

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by tower »

TheLastGentleman wrote:
ldai_phs wrote:I heard today that the Chamber of Commerce is looking at an "AI Superhighway" as part of their transit initiative. Anyone else here something about this?
It sounds awesome but I don't know what it means.
Maybe this is their urban transit partership with google? It probably isn't self driving cars, or they would have just said that- my guess is that it involves using sensors and AI to analyze traffic on a highway to try to predict backups and slowdowns. If it is google, that would be very valuable to them.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by normalthings »

that makes a lot of sense. I personally would rather have public transit over a Google AI Highway.
bobbyhawks
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3890
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by bobbyhawks »

TheLastGentleman wrote:
ldai_phs wrote:I heard today that the Chamber of Commerce is looking at an "AI Superhighway" as part of their transit initiative. Anyone else here something about this?
It sounds awesome but I don't know what it means.
If you blockchain the data lakes and cryptomine the ELK stacks, you can use the cloud to buzzword your way into millions of dollars in consulting fees. No one need question the purpose or required follow-through, because AI Superhighway.
JBmidtown
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by JBmidtown »

bobbyhawks wrote:
TheLastGentleman wrote:
ldai_phs wrote:I heard today that the Chamber of Commerce is looking at an "AI Superhighway" as part of their transit initiative. Anyone else here something about this?
It sounds awesome but I don't know what it means.
If you blockchain the data lakes and cryptomine the ELK stacks, you can use the cloud to buzzword your way into millions of dollars in consulting fees. No one need question the purpose or required follow-through, because AI Superhighway.
You forgot “hyperloop”
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by flyingember »

bobbyhawks wrote:
TheLastGentleman wrote:
ldai_phs wrote:I heard today that the Chamber of Commerce is looking at an "AI Superhighway" as part of their transit initiative. Anyone else here something about this?
It sounds awesome but I don't know what it means.
If you blockchain the data lakes and cryptomine the ELK stacks, you can use the cloud to buzzword your way into millions of dollars in consulting fees. No one need question the purpose or required follow-through, because AI Superhighway.
http://dilbert.com/strip/1994-02-22
User avatar
Anthony_Hugo98
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1918
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:50 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by Anthony_Hugo98 »

Who’s ready for the 7,318th (or is it 19th) rendition of a very rough approximation of a possible master plan and buildout for an LRT, or more light Metro system for the Kansas City metro area. Our team at UrbanLab KC is looking to get some feedback from the more interested community first to refine the plan.

There isn’t a super precise routing on this, so use your imagination. Our intention is to keep the stops more so areas/neighborhoods/Suburban Downtowns so people get a general sense of the system.

Be sure to let me know what y’all think, what you’d like to see change, and what you’d want to maintain. We hope to try and use this to get a conversation going at a higher level here, and get a regional movement going.

Image
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17068
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by GRID »

Why is West Bottoms a hub?
I'm not getting the hype on the west bottoms. It's starting to gentrify, but it has decades and decades before it's even a real neighborhood and even then it won't really be that big (dense etc) of a neighborhood compared to other parts of downtown.

I don't think you will ever have the density or ridership to justify LRT north of the river or in Wyandotte County. If it ever does happen, there wont' be federal money for it (won't qualify) so it will have to be all locally funded. I understand you have to include those if they are going to contribute, so don't ask them to contribute. It would only bog things down. A high quality BRT system in WyCo and the Northland is much more feasible.

I would concentrate on Jackson County only (not KCMO which includes too much of the northland) and let Johnson County come after Jackson has established something. The routes in Jackson and Johnson seem like they are fine for a place to start brainstorming.

I would also plan to add more urban trams to compliment the LRT. I don't see how the current tram line could be a part of this, so LRT would have to run along a different corridor in the urban core like Troost till it gets closer to downtown and then it can jump onto Oak or something.
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7137
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by beautyfromashes »

It's a fine design. The problem is that all the ends of those lines (Legends, Lee's Summit, Olathe, Belton, etc) their whole goal is to literally keep you from going downtown. And they SURE don't want people from downtown coming out to them. There is only one single way to get this type of plan to materialize: the urban core has to start winning, and winning big! Major corporate relocations to the city have to exclusively be choosing DT, when talking about the best schools in the metro DT has to get conversation, crime has to nosedive, stadiums only want to be DT, etc. Otherwise, Lee's Summit is going to try and build themselves an island you never have to leave. Same for Overland Park and the Northland. Quit trying to connect to people that don't want to connect to us. Compete at all levels.
User avatar
alejandro46
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1350
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:24 pm
Location: King in the North(Land)

Re: KC area Transit master plan LIGHT RAIL OR BUST!

Post by alejandro46 »

The biggest question is not the routes, its the funding. The funding will determine the routes.
Anyways, if I could Sim City it, I'd largely reconstruct some of the old SC routes but leave out others (like Excelsior).

Quick and Dirty Map
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid= ... sp=sharing
Last edited by alejandro46 on Mon Jan 02, 2023 11:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply