Downtown Bridge Art

Have a development question you want answered? Ask it here and you'll get your answer
Post Reply
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Downtown Bridge Art

Post by dangerboy »

Anyone know what happened to the installation of panels on the bridges over I-670?  Looks like they stopped about six months ago and just abandoned the project.
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

dangerboy wrote: Anyone know what happened to the installation of panels on the bridges over I-670?  Looks like they stopped about six months ago and just abandoned the project.
I am pretty sure that the post-wyandotte bridges were only intended to have the limited amount of panels that you see today. 
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by dangerboy »

LenexatoKCMO wrote: I am pretty sure that the post-wyandotte bridges were only intended to have the limited amount of panels that you see today. 
So it's "complete" ?  The final design is essentially chain link with a few random panels?  Wow.
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

Yeah I was a little dissapointed when I figured out that was the final product.  Though it is perhaps a bit more wild, I like the first design on Wyandotte much better - both from an artistic and functional perspective. 
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20039
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by DaveKCMO »

yes, half-assed and disappointing. sometimes they move the panels, but the number stays the same.
User avatar
staubio
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 6958
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 11:17 am
Location: River Market
Contact:

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by staubio »

Wow, this is news to me. I thought it was just taking an inexplicably long time to get finished. Was this by design or did they just figure out they could only afford 1/3 of the panels?
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

staubio wrote: Wow, this is news to me. I thought it was just taking an inexplicably long time to get finished. Was this by design or did they just figure out they could only afford 1/3 of the panels?
Pretty sure it was by design.  I figured it out quite a few months ago when I realized that the bridge sides are only desinged to fit the little stretches of the rails/frames that hold the panels in place.  If you walk over it and pay attention to the construction it is pretty obvious this is how it was built. 
lock+load
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4209
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:25 am
Location: brookside

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by lock+load »

It looked better without the tall fence.
User avatar
elextendo
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:40 pm

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by elextendo »

I chimed in on this awhile ago..YEP..I think the Bridge Art is a huge waste of money ..concept for bridge art is good, execution and again the amount I think in the $700k range we got shafted...Woodfill (artist) Eldorado ( Architects ) are for the most part way better than this.. The biggest complaint I have toward architects designing sculpture are the city entrance markers @ river market and north of the downtown airport..these never work and are extremely lame. (concrete columns with LEDs).
P&L Free since 2008
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by dangerboy »

I don't have an opinion either way on the art itself.  My problem with it is that the goal was supposed to be to shield the pedestrian from highway below and make the walk across the bridge a little more pleasant. Chain link fence and some randomly-placed panels does not do this.

This artwork needed to be both attractive and functional.  It totally fails at the functional part.
drumatix
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:25 pm

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by drumatix »

dangerboy wrote: This artwork needed to be both attractive and functional.  It totally fails at the functional part.
I won't defend or attack the bridge art, but can say without a doubt that you've mentioned a balance that can be extremely tricky to achieve. Those panels do have to be functional from a city/state/DOT perspective, and I'm willing to bet that the bureaucrats were made very happy by the design of the panel system, meaning that - at least on paper - it keeps cars & pedestrians from plummeting onto the freeway. BNIM & similar companies require just under $200k per bridge to put up the bare-bones minimum chain link system that can be seen on many of the downtown overpasses. I do not know for a fact, but I'm guessing that the Eldo/Woodfill system that's being discussed was an 'all in' project for $700k, needing to satisfy the mentioned DOT requirements AND be aesthetically pleasing without breaking the budget. It's far from a dream job. Satisfying the safety requirements likely sucked up 90% of the budget.
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by dangerboy »

drumatix wrote: I won't defend or attack the bridge art, but can say without a doubt that you've mentioned a balance that can be extremely tricky to achieve. Those panels do have to be functional from a city/state/DOT perspective
I think the panels are fine from an aesthetic perspective.  The problem is that they only put 3-4 panels per bridge.  The original renderings and description seemed to suggest that the panels would run the length of the bridge, creating a continuous wall of art. 
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

dangerboy wrote: creating a continuous wall of art. 
Like what was put on the first bridge - Wyandotte.  You can walk over that thing and really be fairly oblivious to the interstate below thanks to the continuous art.  Unfortunately the bridge with the best execution, is probably the least likely to see foot traffic. 
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33828
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by KCPowercat »

I figured they didn't fill it completely with panels since so the highway signs would block those portions from view, so they were saving money not additional additional panels?
http://downtownkcmo.blogspot.com

Tweeting live from Big 12 tournament @downtownkc
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by dangerboy »

LenexatoKCMO wrote: Like what was put on the first bridge - Wyandotte.  You can walk over that thing and really be fairly oblivious to the interstate below thanks to the continuous art. 
And that benefit was touted as being the primary reason for the replicating the idea on the other bridges.

Although the Wyandotte bridge is significantly higher than the other bridges, so the highway was always a little less ominous there.
scooterj
Ambassador
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 1:30 pm
Location: Northmoor
Contact:

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by scooterj »

elextendo wrote: The biggest complaint I have toward architects designing sculpture are the city entrance markers @ river market and north of the downtown airport..these never work and are extremely lame. (concrete columns with LEDs).
The Watchdog strikes again!

http://www.kansascity.com/115/story/1036318.html
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by dangerboy »

This is a different bridge and a totally different art project...
scooterj
Ambassador
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 1:30 pm
Location: Northmoor
Contact:

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by scooterj »

dangerboy wrote: This is a different bridge and a totally different art project...
I know, I was refering to Stretch's tangental comment earlier in the discussion.
User avatar
elextendo
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:40 pm

Re: Downtown Bridge Art

Post by elextendo »

Thanks..I bet its  at least another 6 months.. they( both locations) dont work correctly..
P&L Free since 2008
Post Reply