Remember, he arena already has a tenant.

Come here for discussion about the new downtown entertainment district.
Post Reply
scooterj
Ambassador
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 1:30 pm
Location: Northmoor
Contact:

Remember, he arena already has a tenant.

Post by scooterj »

Those in the opposition who like to claim that the arena will sit empty need to be reminded that one tenant is already on board, which is more than many other cities had when they built their now-successful arenas.

They also need to think logically... would private companies pump $50,000,000, $62,500,000, and $10,000,000 into the cost if they were not certain of a return on their investment?

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascit ... 230313.htm

[quote]
Posted on Sat, Jul. 24, 2004

NABC can't imagine future without arena

By BLAIR KERKHOFF
The Kansas City Star


What if the answer is no?

“That's not going to happen,â€
KC0KEK
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4855
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Re: Remember, he arena already has a tenant.

Post by KC0KEK »

scooterj wrote:They also need to think logically... would private companies pump $50,000,000, $62,500,000, and $10,000,000 into the cost if they were not certain of a return on their investment?
Sure they would -- and have. Look, for example, at how much Sprint spent on flops such as MMDS. Happens all the time. Just because someone makes CEO or CFO doesn't mean that he knows what he's doing.

By the way, my comment isn't a criticism of the arena. Rather it's an observation on companies in general.
Post Reply