LenexatoKCMO wrote: .Â
Apparently you didn't read the article BFA posted where it is already starting to rumble that the team may bolt if the county doesn't do something by 2010.Â
the owner of the team is al davis. he is the managing general partner of the oakland raiders. HE HAS NOT SAID HE WILL MOVE, OR THAT HE WANTS A NEW STADIUM. al davis does not give two shits about your opinion of the oakland collesium. neither do i.
LenexatoKCMO wrote:Once again. Suing the county in an attempt to get out of the lease and move the team someplace better says all that needs to be said.
maybe if you understood pro sports and stadiums, which, you do not, you would understand what the man is after here, he says the city of oakland promised him sell outs, and after close to 2 decades AND a promised, agreed upon renovation, they have yet to materialize. so, that is great and all, however, he wants those sell outs. new orleans owner tom benson had a similar promise, and gets a 10m payout annually from the state of louisiana. maybe davis wants the money he is short.
one thing for sure, HE HAS NOT BITCHED ABOUT THE RENOVATIONS
. and you fail to admit you were wrong about that.
. The only important difference between the A's and the Royal's is that we wont have a talented GM able to perform miracles and repeatedly get us to the playoffs, masking the problem of the uninspiring renovation.
perhaps if the royals young talent comes through this year, bautista, wood, teahen, buck, hernandez, perhaps, you will eat shit on that one. either way, they are yet to win in october, so, yeah, they win the smallest division in the american league, repeatedly, and get the wild card, that is great and all, but, either way, have not done shit in october, have they??
bottom line, still, no matter how much you wish to hide it, you said that that al davis was bitching about the renovations. and have yet to prove that. just immuendos.