KANROCKSAS

People say they enjoy Kansas City. Find out why.
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by KCMax »

:shock: Wow. I assume this thing is dead then. That was a really good lineup.
User avatar
grovester
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4572
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: KC Metro

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by grovester »

Location, location, location.
kcjak
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2435
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by kcjak »

Yeah, I thought the lineup was really strong. I was considering buying a ticket to one of the days but wasn't willing to shell out $100 for one day to see a couple of bands play 20-30 minute sets. And as of last week I was unable to find out a schedule with set times.

On a side note we tailgated in the Speedway parking lot for the Sporting game on Sunday...what a miserable, wind-driven, barren place that was. Throw down a few trees already.
User avatar
WSPanic
Supporter
Posts: 3817
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 4:57 pm

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by WSPanic »

I thought the lineup was really weak, but that's just a matter of personal taste. Not much there I had heard of. I miss having Wakarusa in the neighborhood. Love their lineup.
User avatar
AllThingsKC
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9364
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Kansas City, Missouri (Downtown)
Contact:

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by AllThingsKC »

Can they recover from back-to-back years of cancelling this?
User avatar
grovester
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4572
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: KC Metro

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by grovester »

No.
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by chaglang »

Seems like a combination of venue and target audience. That was probably the best lineup they had in any year, but it skewed heavily toward indie bands. Maybe the hipsters don't want to stand around on a speedway for 16 hours.
TheBigChuckbowski
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3565
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: Longfellow

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by TheBigChuckbowski »

chaglang wrote:Seems like a combination of venue and target audience. That was probably the best lineup they had in any year, but it skewed heavily toward indie bands. Maybe the hipsters don't want to stand around on a speedway for 16 hours.
Or pay $200 for short sets for bands you can see for $40 or less in better venues.
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by chaglang »

And that. At least a couple of those acts have been here recently for free/cheap shows put on by 96.5.
aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12647
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by aknowledgeableperson »

Entertainment Weekly had this as one of the top festivals in the country this summer. Little did they know.
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by KCMax »

Kanrocksas founder Bill Brandmeyer is being sued by local booking and promotions company Mammoth Inc.
The suit claims that the actions of Brandmeyer's company, MMF LLC, have "effectively destroyed Mammoth's business and ruined the company's reputation and ability to do business in the music industry."
The lawsuit (you can scroll through it below) has a few other interesting tidbits. It alleges that Mammoth, after learning of Brandmeyer's intention to cancel the festival, secured an alternative venue to hold the fest, but Brandmeyer still canceled. It also alleges that Brandmeyer hasn't paid any of the artists.
longviewmo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Contact:

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by longviewmo »

Favorite part of skimming the lawsuit was #43

"Mammoth imperatively and unambiguously told Defendants that they were handling this in a hokie manner, that they were throwing Mammoth under the bus, and that such action would ruin Mammoth."
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: KANROCKSAS

Post by chaglang »

longviewmo wrote:Favorite part of skimming the lawsuit was #43

"Mammoth imperatively and unambiguously told Defendants that they were handling this in a hokie manner, that they were throwing Mammoth under the bus, and that such action would ruin Mammoth."
Legal argle-blargle.
Post Reply