Norman School

Discuss items in the urban core outside of Downtown as described above. Everything in the core including the east side (18th & Vine area), Northeast, Plaza, Westport, Brookside, Valentine, Waldo, 39th street, & the entire midtown area.
User avatar
Midtownkid
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2987
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 4:27 pm
Location: Roanoke, KCMO

Norman School

Post by Midtownkid »

A proposal finally from Del. 44 lofts in existing school with 20 more units in appendages attached to back of school. A large pool is planned for the playground area. This plan preserves the open space in front of the school which was a concern for preservationists.

Apparently neighbors are concerned with parking and the pool. Come on, this is much much better than an abandoned building or even worse, demolition. Hope it passes. Pretty exciting if it is done right.

Image

http://midtownkcpost.com/first-look-at- ... an-school/

Image
atticus23
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:14 pm
Location: Roanoke/Volker

Re: Norman School

Post by atticus23 »

This is great news and IMO I think the neighborhood is probably just voicing normal concerns (or at least I hope). As you said ANYTHING is better than an empty building...
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Norman School

Post by flyingember »

neighbors are concerned with parking over having a place for homeless and criminals to break into and live in?

amazing...
zonk
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:07 pm
Location: downtown

Re: Norman School

Post by zonk »

CPC denied this project today. Too dense for the neighborhood and also cited traffic issues. Doesn't seem like a very good plan...maybe this denial will result in a better project?
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Norman School

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
taxi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2080
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: North End
Contact:

Re: Norman School

Post by taxi »

A cryin shame. I noticed dumpsters there the other day. I hope this building doesn't get any worse, it is so amazing. I think it's been 7 or 8 years since Del bought it.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Norman School

Post by DaveKCMO »

zonk wrote:CPC denied this project today. Too dense for the neighborhood and also cited traffic issues. Doesn't seem like a very good plan...maybe this denial will result in a better project?
if by "better project" you mean "demolition"? yes.

be careful what you ask for. an empty lot is also low density.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Norman School

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
kcjak
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2429
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Re: Norman School

Post by kcjak »

I wonder what percentage of the neighborhood was against it - seems like people who support development like this typically aren't as vocal as those against.
User avatar
grovester
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: KC Metro

Re: Norman School

Post by grovester »

The commission vote was pretty one sided.
User avatar
JLowe2018
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:25 am
Contact:

Re: Norman School

Post by JLowe2018 »

Midtown KC Post article on the topic says, "The commission voted 5-1 to deny approval for the plan."

Full article can be found here: http://midtownkcpost.com/plan-commissio ... -proposal/

Quite a shame they denied this. I ride by this place twice everyday in the school year and have always thought it's super neat and would be a perfect fit for an apartment conversion. I really hope the developer comes back with a new plan...one that doesn't involve demolition. The only potential problems I saw with this were the proposed add-ons since they could possibly make the project too dense for the neighborhood and might not fit quite right with the rest of the building.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Norman School

Post by DaveKCMO »

kcjak wrote:I wonder what percentage of the neighborhood was against it - seems like people who support development like this typically aren't as vocal as those against.
someone needs to start a midtown YIMBY group.
User avatar
taxi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2080
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: North End
Contact:

Re: Norman School

Post by taxi »

DaveKCMO wrote:
kcjak wrote:I wonder what percentage of the neighborhood was against it - seems like people who support development like this typically aren't as vocal as those against.
someone needs to start a midtown YIMBY group.
Or FYIMBY.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Norman School

Post by flyingember »

I really don't get why "too dense" is worse than "abandoned place perfect for drug deals"

I can understand the point if we're talking about a big empty paved lot. Discussions of scale are valid when coming from nothing. But this is going to need to be torn down to not be a dense project. Even if it's kept for a future school it's going to have more density than today once parking is added as would be expected.
atticus23
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:14 pm
Location: Roanoke/Volker

Re: Norman School

Post by atticus23 »

This really saddens me to read this. This building is beautiful and it's such a shame to see it rotting.
missingkc
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1296
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Norman School

Post by missingkc »

What I find to be the real shame is that every board and authority in KC that deals with approval of proposed projects kowtows to any and every objection by neighbors. It doesn't have to be so. They could stand by stated long term goals set by Council and others - such as increasing population - instead of caving to objections that seem to have become knee-jerk responses to any proposal for increased density. Opposition seems to have become a point of pride.
User avatar
Eon Blue
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1122
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:28 pm
Location: Downtown KCMO

Re: Norman School

Post by Eon Blue »

Not *every* objection. See: Jimmy John's drive-through on Broadway.

:-|
atticus23
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:14 pm
Location: Roanoke/Volker

Re: Norman School

Post by atticus23 »

I saw a bunch of construction/engineering trucks out front this morning on my way to work, is something new happening or just fresh plywood over the windows?
User avatar
JLowe2018
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:25 am
Contact:

Re: Norman School

Post by JLowe2018 »

Just now drove by and saw large debris with lots of dust being tossed out the windows with large dumpsters out front and back.
chingon
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: South Plaza

Re: Norman School

Post by chingon »

Update.

109-unit apartment plan moving clears LCRA.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/business ... 48517.html
Post Reply