Historic Old Northeast

Discuss items in the urban core outside of Downtown as described above. Everything in the core including the east side (18th & Vine area), Plaza, Westport, Brookside, Valentine, Waldo, 39th street, & the entire midtown area.
User avatar
grovester
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3663
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: KC Metro

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby grovester » Thu Jun 21, 2018 6:42 pm

Fuck that guy. "I'm going to leave this property a shit hole until you approve my shit hole project".

alejandro46
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:24 pm
Location: North Plaza

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby alejandro46 » Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:31 pm

Reduce. =D> mandatory. =D> parking. =D> minimums. =D>

User avatar
beautyfromashes
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4079
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby beautyfromashes » Thu Jul 05, 2018 12:37 pm

So, I watched the committee meeting for this development yesterday. If the neighborhood advocate who said she was from Boston is on this board, you were amazing! The committee said they had never heard of a neighborhood asking for more density. Then, Loar has the dumbest look on her face when told, “Most of the neighborhood doesn’t have off street parking, that’s what makes it urban!”. Classic! It was a mic drop thst made the day of this nerdy development watcher. :)

User avatar
FangKC
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12716
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby FangKC » Thu Jul 05, 2018 11:12 pm

beautyfromashes wrote:...The committee said they had never heard of a neighborhood asking for more density. Then, Loar has the dumbest look on her face when told, “Most of the neighborhood doesn’t have off street parking, that’s what makes it urban!”....


There are people whose brains won't process not having a car, or any home or business not having its' own parking. Many of these humans have not been to a really big city.

User avatar
FangKC
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12716
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby FangKC » Fri Jul 06, 2018 4:55 am

Brinshore continues progress on Northeast developments

Brinshore Development’s affordable housing efforts in the Historic Northeast will continue into 2019 with the completion of three new developments comprising nearly 120 combined units.

Roughly eight months after Brinshore Development held a October 2017 ribbon-cutting ceremony for the 30-unit, mixed-income Pendleton Flats complex – its first Paseo Gateway housing project in the Historic Northeast – progress continues at a handful of other Brinshore projects in and around Independence Avenue.

The 38-unit Pendleton ArtsBlock project (Independence Ave. and Olive) is the furthest along, with the footings and foundation already being installed. The 57-unit Quinlan Place (8th and Paseo) and 22-unit Quinlan Row developments (8th and Woodland) are not far behind, and all three projects are expected to be completed by the spring of 2019.
...

While Pendleton Flats, Pendleton ArtsBlock, Quinlan Place and Quinlan Row are part of the wide-ranging Paseo Gateway project, Brinshore has also joined an independent renovation partnership at Maple Flats (511 Maple), a three-building, 72-unit complex set to deliver refurbished, affordable units this month.

“When you’re making the kind of investments that were made in the Pendleton Heights neighborhood, you want to make sure that other buildings get redeveloped,” Brint said. “We’re trying to continue the positive momentum.”

For now, Brinshore is content with the 219 new and renovated affordable units that will be available in the Historic Northeast by the spring of 2019. That said, he didn’t completely rule out the possibility of future investments in the area, if the right opportunity becomes available.


http://northeastnews.net/pages/39992-2/

KansasCityGypsy
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:03 am

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby KansasCityGypsy » Thu Jul 12, 2018 2:21 pm

Pendleton Heights NA meeting with MAC Corp: https://www.facebook.com/161891433869/v ... 227873870/

Independence Ave. retail development continues to get pushback

By Paul Thompson
Northeast News

The developers of a controversial, nearly $2 million Independence Avenue retail project met with Pendleton Heights residents on Tuesday, July 10, though the two sides remain at odds on a project that has received steadfast pushback from community stakeholders.

An 11,000 square-foot retail development has been proposed at Independence and Prospect, in a lot made vacant by a tragic October 2015 blaze that claimed the lives of KCFD firefighters John Mesh and Larry Leggio. That same fire destroyed a previous mixed-use development – both retail and residential – that once stood at the northeast corner of the intersection.

Neighborhood leaders in Pendleton Heights oppose the project because it does not provide the second-floor housing that neighborhood leaders would prefer. However, the developer behind the project said during the July 10 meeting that second-floor apartment units would not be economically feasible without requiring rent of $590 for 300 square-foot studios, $916 for 510 square-foot one-bedrooms, and $1,122 for two-bedroom units that would average 645 square feet.

Though M.A.C. Corp’s estimates for turning a profit on new residential units might have seemed high to some in attendance, M.A.C. Corp President and Senior Project Engineer Robert Andrew stood firm behind his statement that second-floor apartments were not economically feasible.

“We can’t go out there, nor would any of you, and build a property with no return on investment,” he said.

Attendees also questioned M.A.C. Corp’s figures related to typical market rate housing in the Northeast. M.A.C. Corp’s research suggested that market rate in the area is $0.94 per square-foot for one-bedroom units and $0.67 per square-foot for two-bedroom units. At $0.67 per square-foot, one attendee took the 645 square-foot projection for two-bedroom units at the site to infer that market rate was being estimated at a minuscule $432 for area two-bedroom units.

Given a chance to clarify after the meeting, M.A.C. Corp Assistant Project Manager and Engineering Technician Eric Solomon said that the market rate estimate for area two-bedroom apartments was actually derived from a collection of larger units (1,000 to 1,200 square feet) located on Prospect, Montgall, St. John and Maple, which averaged a monthly rent of $.063 per square foot and topped out at $0.67. Those two-bedroom apartments charged between $600 and $800 in monthly rent, depending on size.

Andrew estimated, however, that the developer would need to charge $1.60 per square foot in order to meet the minimum return on investment required by the project’s lender.

“The $1.60 per square-foot rent was based on getting a minimum return on investment that the lender would feel comfortable with in order to finance that project,” Andrew said.

What’s more, Andrew indicated that the property owner – BA Properties, LLC, a group that also owns the Bao Anh Jewelry store at 1835 Independence Avenue – has no interest in taking on the challenges of apartment management. The issue of second-floor residential units was a popular topic at the meeting, but M.A.C. Corp is ultimately operating at the behest of the property owner.

“Their response was, ‘No, we really don’t want to be in the apartment business,’” Andrew said.

At the July 10 meeting at Kansas City University – held during the Pendleton Heights monthly neighborhood meeting – 1st District Councilman Scott Wagner served as a moderator as M.A.C. Corp answered questions from neighborhood residents.

The first question came from John Bordeau, who asked M.A.C. Corp what the project budget is, and how it’s being financed. Andrew offered up an estimated price tag of $1,984,000, and revealed that the project was being paid for through traditional bank financing. Andrew conceded, however, that the estimated project costs haven’t been updated to reflect the recent tariffs proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump.

“We’ve had a $25,000 increase in steel costs as a result of those tariffs,” Andrew said. “We haven’t updated it, but it’s approximately $2 million.”

Mary Cyr, Director of Northeast Alliance Together (NEAT), also questioned Andrew. Cyr, who testified against the project on behalf of the Northeast’s six neighborhoods during a June 20 Planning, Zoning and Economic Development committee meeting, asked Andrew why the property owners weren’t pursuing low-income tax credits for the project.

“It’s competitive, and there’s X number of dollars allocated for those incentives, and your timing has to be perfect,” Andrew responded. “It just didn’t seem applicable to what we were doing.”

The planned 11,000 square-foot structure conforms with the Independence Avenue overlay district, the Pendleton Heights historic district, and Kansas City parks and boulevards standards. It includes more than 30 parking spots, a stormwater detention basin, a front-facing patio, solid wood fencing along the north end of the property and a fully-enclosed trash area surround by a brick wall. Developers are also intent on constructing a monument in honor of Mesh and Leggio, the fallen KCFD firefighters.

Solomon described how the floor plan would be laid out.

“We have up to nine units proposed for this building,” said Solomon. “The average size is about 1,500 square feet.”

Certain tenants wouldn’t be allowed at the development, including adult media stores, day labor agencies, taverns or night clubs, smoking lounges, payday loan stores, pawn shops and plasma center. Target tenants include businesses that offer frozen yogurt, pet grooming, bike sales, dry cleaning, tax prep, and physical activities like yoga or martial arts. M.A.C. Corp told attendees that it has already identified prospective tenants that include a coffee shop, a boutique retailer, a diner/ice cream shop, an Asian/sushi restaurant, a beauty supply store, and a computer/electronics store.

“You have to have compatible and complimentary tenants,” Andrew said. “We don’t want to directly compete; we want to complement other tenants in the area.”

Solomon and Andrew wouldn’t reveal the names of potential tenants for the site, but suggested that at least some prospective businesses have signed letters of intent, should the project eventually be approved by the City Council.

That scenario is no formality, it should be noted; now more than a year removed from gaining approval from the City Plan Commission, the project was held by the KCMO Planning, Zoning and Economic Development committee last month. At the time, committee members suggested that the developers needed to do more to convince surrounding neighborhoods to embrace the project.

“If the community does not embrace a project, then the project doesn’t happen,” said 1st District Councilman Heather Hall during the June 20 committee meeting. “If it does happen, then it’s not successful, because the community will not shop there.”

Neighborhood residents who hold out hope for residential units at the site may still apply pressure on City Council members who reside on the Planning, Zoning and Economic Development committee to reject the proposal. That said, the project developers have previously indicated that BA Properties, LLC has no intention of selling the property, even if their current proposal is rejected.

“For the foreseeable future, she’s not looking to sell the property,” Solomon said of Anh Le Duong, who represents the ownership group. “It’s basically a giant pit in the neighborhood that isn’t doing anybody any good. The longer this plays out, the worse it is for everyone.”

If BA Properties, LLC truly is willing to play the long game – by simply holding the property as a long-term investment even without a retail development on site – then the site could remain vacant for years to come.

The proposal will go back before the City Council’s Planning, Zoning and Economic Development committee on July 25.

Northeast News: http://northeastnews.net/pages/independ ... -pushback/

flyingember
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 6588
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby flyingember » Thu Jul 12, 2018 2:53 pm

Neighborhood leaders in Pendleton Heights oppose the project because it does not provide the second-floor housing that neighborhood leaders would prefer. However, the developer behind the project said during the July 10 meeting that second-floor apartment units would not be economically feasible without requiring rent of $590 for 300 square-foot studios, $916 for 510 square-foot one-bedrooms, and $1,122 for two-bedroom units that would average 645 square feet.

Their numbers sound right for new construction adding in overhead and profit. I see no reason to dispute the required rental rates.

This is good to add to the list of reasons showing why affordable housing and old buildings go together.

To save the math, the steel tariffs are adding 1.2% to the project.

“If the community does not embrace a project, then the project doesn’t happen,” said 1st District Councilman Heather Hall during the June 20 committee meeting. “If it does happen, then it’s not successful, because the community will not shop there.”

The community may grumble but if a new type of business opens I see no reason people wouldn't shop there. This is just hyperbole.

User avatar
smh
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2832
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:40 pm
Location: Central Loop

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby smh » Thu Jul 12, 2018 2:55 pm

Thanks for saving the math. *whew*

KansasCityGypsy
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:03 am

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby KansasCityGypsy » Thu Jul 12, 2018 3:02 pm

In the comments of this article, MAC Corp writes that very few residents of Northeast oppose their plan for the intersection of Independence Avenue and Prospect, where the firemen were killed after the owner of the nail salon set fire to the building. That is utter nonsense. Who are they trying to convince?

https://www.facebook.com/northeastnewsk ... 0770835942

User avatar
FangKC
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12716
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Historic Old Northeast

Postby FangKC » Sat Jul 14, 2018 7:26 am

FangKC wrote:The warehouse building on the NE corner of 9th and Paseo is being demolished. The Quinlan Place apartments will replace it.

Image

Image

Image


July 13, 2018.

Looking northeast near E. 9th and Paseo.

Image

Looking east from Paseo.

Image


Return to “Urban Core”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests