OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18132
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by FangKC »

Affordable Apartment Project Proposed for Downtown Riverfront
An Omaha developer is proposing a 60-unit apartment project near Berkley Riverfront Park that’s intended to help meet the demand for affordable housing downtown.

Cornerstone Associates, which recently opened the 531 Grand market-rate apartment project in the River Market, is requesting federal tax credits administered by the Missouri Housing Development Commission to help finance the $13 million project.

...

The Cornerstone development proposal calls for a four-story building with 22 one-bedroom; 31, two-bedroom, and seven,three-bedroom units.

Rents would range from $485- to $785 for one-bedrooms; $570- to $925, two-bedrooms, and $645- to $1,000 for a three-bedroom.

The apartments would be limited to people earning 40- to 60 percent of the area median income.

The project would be located east of the new Bar K dog park and cafe under construction, and west of the partly-opened 451-unit, market-rate Union apartment project developed by Indianapolis-based Flaherty & Collins.

It would be near the planned extension of the streetcar to Berkley Park. The developer also said the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority has agreed to provide a new bus stop within a quarter mile of the project.
...
https://cityscenekc.com/affordable-apar ... iverfront/
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33735
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by KCPowercat »

Not a fan of an entire affordable housing building next to the nice market rate building. I mean I get affordable housing can't have every Bell and whistle amenity but all affordable housing tends to turn into a mess.
kcjak
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2429
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by kcjak »

Why is this being built in a riverfront location that can demand higher market rents when the East Village continues to languish?
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by DaveKCMO »

KCPowercat wrote:Not a fan of an entire affordable housing building next to the nice market rate building. I mean I get affordable housing can't have every Bell and whistle amenity but all affordable housing tends to turn into a mess.
We already have that scenario downtown.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17068
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by GRID »

KCPowercat wrote:Not a fan of an entire affordable housing building next to the nice market rate building. I mean I get affordable housing can't have every Bell and whistle amenity but all affordable housing tends to turn into a mess.
Yeah, they better be careful with this project. I thought the port authority would need higher end, more dense and market rate apartments for the riverfront to help fund the streetcar extension.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by DaveKCMO »

GRID wrote:
KCPowercat wrote:Not a fan of an entire affordable housing building next to the nice market rate building. I mean I get affordable housing can't have every Bell and whistle amenity but all affordable housing tends to turn into a mess.
Yeah, they better be careful with this project. I thought the port authority would need higher end, more dense and market rate apartments for the riverfront to help fund the streetcar extension.
There are like 12 parcels for development. Each developer is agreeing to pay into the riverfront streetcar.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17068
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by GRID »

DaveKCMO wrote:
GRID wrote:
KCPowercat wrote:Not a fan of an entire affordable housing building next to the nice market rate building. I mean I get affordable housing can't have every Bell and whistle amenity but all affordable housing tends to turn into a mess.
Yeah, they better be careful with this project. I thought the port authority would need higher end, more dense and market rate apartments for the riverfront to help fund the streetcar extension.
There are like 12 parcels for development. Each developer is agreeing to pay into the riverfront streetcar.
That's good. I still thought the riverfront would try to get at least 6-7 story buildings in there. They have a finite amount of space to develop and create a dense enough neighborhood to warrant the extension of the streetcar.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by flyingember »

GRID wrote: still thought the riverfront would try to get at least 6-7 story buildings in there. They have a finite amount of space to develop and create a dense enough neighborhood to warrant the extension of the streetcar.
Go review the plan from their website. It's mostly low buildings in their concept plans except for a couple of parcels on the east end

https://www.portkc.com/wp-content/uploa ... W_2017.pdf
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18132
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by FangKC »

loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by loftguy »

KCPowercat wrote:Not a fan of an entire affordable housing building next to the nice market rate building. I mean I get affordable housing can't have every Bell and whistle amenity but all affordable housing tends to turn into a mess.
This is a gross overstatement KCPowercat.
One-fourth of the buildings in the River Market have been affordable for the past 20 years.
You can't see a difference from their market-rate neighbors.

As Dave mentioned, there are many low-moderate income apartment buildings scattered throughout the downtown loop and the crossroads.
There too, no one would know, unless they know.

We've got to stop the demonizing of affordable housing.
It's bad form and detrimental to creating a city that works.
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by loftguy »

flyingember wrote:
GRID wrote: still thought the riverfront would try to get at least 6-7 story buildings in there. They have a finite amount of space to develop and create a dense enough neighborhood to warrant the extension of the streetcar.
Go review the plan from their website. It's mostly low buildings in their concept plans except for a couple of parcels on the east end

https://www.portkc.com/wp-content/uploa ... W_2017.pdf
That is only a place-holder conceptual plan to reflect total buildable floor area.
None of the 'buildings' represent actual planned projects.
kboish
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: West Plaza

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by kboish »

loftguy wrote:
KCPowercat wrote:Not a fan of an entire affordable housing building next to the nice market rate building. I mean I get affordable housing can't have every Bell and whistle amenity but all affordable housing tends to turn into a mess.
This is a gross overstatement KCPowercat.
One-fourth of the buildings in the River Market have been affordable for the past 20 years.
You can't see a difference from their market-rate neighbors.

As Dave mentioned, there are many low-moderate income apartment buildings scattered throughout the downtown loop and the crossroads.
There too, no one would know, unless they know.

We've got to stop the demonizing of affordable housing.
It's bad form and detrimental to creating a city that works.
Yes to this.

The term affordable housing tends to be conflated with concentrated, 1970's era high-rise Housing Authority projects and they couldn't be any more different.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33735
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by KCPowercat »

Nobody was demonizing. I just prefer mixed income housing projects.
KCTOGA
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 12:06 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by KCTOGA »

Omaha has built several nice 12 to 15 story appt. towers on their riverfront. Think we should demand at least a 7 story minimum the rest of the way here.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17068
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by GRID »

KCTOGA wrote:Omaha has built several nice 12 to 15 story appt. towers on their riverfront. Think we should demand at least a 7 story minimum the rest of the way here.
That's all I'm saying. That is such prime real estate with limited space to develop with no NIMBY's nearby. Four story buildings seems pretty inefficient to me especially considering the cost to bring the streetcar down there. I would think 7 floors should be the minimum in that area with 8-12 being ideal.
snigglefritz
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:17 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by snigglefritz »

GRID wrote:
KCTOGA wrote:Omaha has built several nice 12 to 15 story appt. towers on their riverfront. Think we should demand at least a 7 story minimum the rest of the way here.
That's all I'm saying. That is such prime real estate with limited space to develop with no NIMBY's nearby. Four story buildings seems pretty inefficient to me especially considering the cost to bring the streetcar down there. I would think 7 floors should be the minimum in that area with 8-12 being ideal.
While I definitely don't think this move maximizes potential tax revenues, I think there's something to be said about diversifying income levels in a part of town that is very likely to see an imminent development boom. Plus, I'd think it lessens the impact (to some degree) of "gentrification" in other parts of town that desperately need re-development.
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5468
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by moderne »

Why would anyone want to live here once they get a whiff of the rank odors from the plant across the river? On hot summer days it can be disgusting.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by flyingember »

moderne wrote:Why would anyone want to live here once they get a whiff of the rank odors from the plant across the river? On hot summer days it can be disgusting.
National Starch. That’s the smell of grain.
tower
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:45 am
Location: Midtown

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by tower »

KCTOGA wrote:Omaha has built several nice 12 to 15 story appt. towers on their riverfront. Think we should demand at least a 7 story minimum the rest of the way here.
I would rather have the PortKC rendering of the riverfront over Omaha's riverfront any day of the week. Omaha's riverfront is the opposite of a dense, energetic neighborhood. Very suburban.

We should get higher building heights, I'm just saying that I will be very disappointed if our riverfront turns out to be anything like Omaha's
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17068
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by GRID »

tower wrote:
KCTOGA wrote:Omaha has built several nice 12 to 15 story appt. towers on their riverfront. Think we should demand at least a 7 story minimum the rest of the way here.
I would rather have the PortKC rendering of the riverfront over Omaha's riverfront any day of the week. Omaha's riverfront is the opposite of a dense, energetic neighborhood. Very suburban.

We should get higher building heights, I'm just saying that I will be very disappointed if our riverfront turns out to be anything like Omaha's
The recreational side of Omaha's riverfront is quite nice and KC could really use something similar. However, I agree 100% on the development of Omaha's riverfront of which half is surface parking lots. I would take what KC has built so far over what Omaha has done in a heartbeat. I would just like to see the buildings be more in the 6-9 floor range rather than 4-5. But even four story buildings spread across the entire riverfront is better than a couple of 12 story towers surrounded by open space.

Hopefully KC ends up with a similar, but larger and slightly more dense residential neighborhood than the one that has recently developed in St Paul.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/St+Pa ... 93.0899578
Post Reply