OFFICIAL - The Continental Apartments (former Mark Twain Tower)

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: OFFICIAL - The Continental Apartments (former Mark Twain Tower)

Post by flyingember »

taxi wrote: Perhaps he will only park historic cars in there.
Then when someone runs into the building they can be surprised when a car falls out.
lock+load
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4209
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:25 am
Location: brookside

Re: OFFICIAL - The Continental Apartments (former Mark Twain Tower)

Post by lock+load »

Numerous mentions in the proposal of parts of the building which are inconsistent with a modern office building. Well maybe a modern office building is not its best use. There has to be a way to get that pool back into service in some capacity. Hotel, health club, residential, something.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: OFFICIAL - The Continental Apartments (former Mark Twain Tower)

Post by flyingember »

What I remember is other developers couldn't find a way for it to work as an office building. It was just a bad design for that.

Suddenly this developer has this strange (at best) plan that somehow does work?
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: OFFICIAL - The Continental Apartments (former Mark Twain Tower)

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JBmidtown
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am

Re: OFFICIAL - The Continental Apartments (former Mark Twain Tower)

Post by JBmidtown »

What happens if they get all the tax credits and go-aheads they want? There's got to be a way to stop such destruction of a historic building
User avatar
Eon Blue
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1122
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:28 pm
Location: Downtown KCMO

Re: OFFICIAL - The Continental Apartments (former Mark Twain Tower)

Post by Eon Blue »

Word on Twitter is that a decision was delayed.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5468
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by moderne »

I hope they bring back the old name of the building.
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by chaglang »

In an interview in the BizJournal, there was mention by the developer or the developer's architect that there will actually be six floors of parking in the building, getting historic tax credits shouldn't be a problem, and the whole project isn't that big of a deal.
JBmidtown
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by JBmidtown »

This is very frustrating
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by DaveKCMO »

JBmidtown wrote:This is very frustrating
the council doesn't have to take the EDC's recommendations on incentives. it also has to get through city planning first.
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7138
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by beautyfromashes »

Eventually, (maybe soon) the downtown market will be able to stand alone without incentives. The council better get a plan in place because when that happens, the city would have no recourse to deny a terrible project like this one. The developer would just go without the incentives and do what they want.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by DaveKCMO »

beautyfromashes wrote:Eventually, (maybe soon) the downtown market will be able to stand alone without incentives. The council better get a plan in place because when that happens, the city would have no recourse to deny a terrible project like this one. The developer would just go without the incentives and do what they want.
other than modifying the existing zoning (DC-15) to require transparency, which is in progress now...
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7138
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by beautyfromashes »

So, the owner of the P&L could decide to remove the lights on top and replace it with a helicopter pad and the city would have no recourse? We have building codes in place for any new construction or refurbishment. We can't put into the code a predevelopment plan that requires approval by a board representing the interests of the citizenry?
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by DaveKCMO »

beautyfromashes wrote:So, the owner of the P&L could decide to remove the lights on top and replace it with a helicopter pad and the city would have no recourse? We have building codes in place for any new construction or refurbishment. We can't put into the code a predevelopment plan that requires approval by a board representing the interests of the citizenry?
i doubt a helipad is allowed.

most people don't want a design review incorporated into the development process. they tend to go awry. best to just make the requirements in advance and hope staff does their job.
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7138
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by beautyfromashes »

DaveKCMO wrote: i doubt a helipad is allowed.
Cause that'd be ridiculous.
User avatar
KCDowntown
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1024
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:17 pm

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by KCDowntown »

I'm not sure of the implications, but it appears, for now, that the Codes Department is denying the developer's request for turning the bottom 6 floors into parking because the aisle widths are too narrow.

Staff Report I found in Kiva

KCDowntown
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by flyingember »

I'd like to think of it this way

the developer believes they can only fill the units at their preferred rates with a certain number of parking spots. The city denied the skinnier aisle widths required to fit that many spots in. So in some manner the developer has to go back and rethink the project. It's possible the bank is demanding a certain number of spots per unit to give a loan so this could potentially change the ability for the project to move forward.

Alternatively that amount of parking is really not required and they're just trying to get away with ignoring codes.

If it is required and they want to move forward they need to find alternatives. But if they can find alternatives, why would they not use those six floors for tenants and put all the parking there?

I doubt it's the case but I would love this to be the city and developer working together on a stupid bank requirement to get this bank to start taking no parking development seriously. That this really is the best project to get a conversion of this building and the developer knew they were never getting approved by the city.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by DaveKCMO »

looks like a good project for a "developer in the public interest". a parking-free mixed use redevelopment taking advantage of historic tax credits!
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: Mark Twain Tower going residential?

Post by loftguy »

I would not take on a zero parking provided apartment development of more than a handful of units.

We are not there yet.

edit: It may take a public-private partnership (with the public carrying the risk) to do so, and prove the viability.
Post Reply