OFFICIAL - Reverb (1800 Walnut)

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
Post Reply
KanzaSphinx
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:21 am

Re: OFFICIAL - Reverb (1800 Walnut)

Post by KanzaSphinx »

anonkcmo wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:21 pm
flyingember wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:50 am
anonkcmo wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am ....
IMO this look doesn't fit The Crossroads rugged and industrial feel.
....
The Crossroads' largest building is designed entirely out of smooth curves.
I hate corresponding with you (and when I say hate - it's a deep-seated loathing).
As usual your half-witted replies are veiled attempts to argue minutia, opinion and semantics.
And here again "smooth curves" on a particular building have nothing (zero) to do with my comment.
My comment is exclusively about the added texture/facade of the wave feature of 1800 Walnut.

If you're referring to 2 Pershing Sq, you are entirely wrong (as usual).
It clearly has some straight edges.... along with curved features on other corners.
https://media.bizj.us/view/img/10244473 ... 0-1062.jpg

Perhaps you're referring to another building?

Image
User avatar
AlbertHammond
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:52 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by AlbertHammond »

AlbertHammond wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 12:23 pm
kboish wrote: Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:34 pm This image gives a better look at how little active use there is on the ground floor.
Image
kboish has it right. We must not be wowed by the building as a piece of sculpture. Look only at the bottom floor or two to see if it is good urbanism. This building is brutal from that view. At the pedestrian scale, 75% of this design is despondent and brutal. The 25% with storefronts can't make up for all the 'bad' happening here.

Image

Image

Sure, adding a building with housing and a bit of retail is good, but this is not as good as it could be.
After further review….

The entire west side of this building touches an open and useful alley. The service access and parking access could use it, but instead ignores it and puts these anti-urban uses on the street. We should fight these assaults on good urban form!!
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by DaveKCMO »

That alley was vacated, so they do not own the entire thing. A vacation splits the public property between the adjacent owners.
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7138
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by beautyfromashes »

DaveKCMO wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:11 pm That alley was vacated, so they do not own the entire thing. A vacation splits the public property between the adjacent owners.
But, they would still have it for access to the garage. Make the garage entrance to the west.

Honestly, I like this building. Not perfect, but unique, tall enough and fills the block. Would like a better streetfront, but overall a good project.
missingkc
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1296
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by missingkc »

Love the waves. Probably will by done by KC's own Zahner. Question to those lamenting the street experience: in your opinion, what differences would have made the building excellent? "More street level retail" alone isn't an answer as that would have reduced ground level parking. How would you add ground level retail, keep adequate parking, and keep costs in line? Informed ideas out there?
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by normalthings »

beautyfromashes wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:36 pm
DaveKCMO wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:11 pm That alley was vacated, so they do not own the entire thing. A vacation splits the public property between the adjacent owners.
But, they would still have it for access to the garage. Make the garage entrance to the west.

Honestly, I like this building. Not perfect, but unique, tall enough and fills the block. Would like a better streetfront, but overall a good project.
No. The alley was vacated so the adjacent property owner can build on their half of the alley. That’s why you wouldn’t,and they didn’t, put a garage entrance there.
missingkc
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1296
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by missingkc »

Can they build on their half of the alley? Are there no setbacks in KC?
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7138
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by beautyfromashes »

missingkc wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:50 pm Can they build on their half of the alley? Are there no setbacks in KC?
Seems they would either want to build in it or secure joint access with the neighbor. Having half a wasted alley would be pointless if the neighbor builds in their half.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20024
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by DaveKCMO »

The alley was vacated by previous owners years ago -- before Lead Bank and Corrigan Station were even on paper.
anonkcmo
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 11:26 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by anonkcmo »

cardium wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:51 pm The referenced building is KCPAC
If true, the PAC is nowhere near as large as Pershing Square Two.
1800 Walnut and the PAC have nothing in common.
#infiniterabbithole
snigglefritz
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:17 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by snigglefritz »

anonkcmo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:54 am
cardium wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:51 pm The referenced building is KCPAC
If true, the PAC is nowhere near as large as Pershing Square Two.
1800 Walnut and the PAC have nothing in common.
#infiniterabbithole
It's almost as if flyingmember was being facetious
User avatar
AlbertHammond
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:52 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by AlbertHammond »

missingkc wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:23 pm Question to those lamenting the street experience: in your opinion, what differences would have made the building excellent? "More street level retail" alone isn't an answer as that would have reduced ground level parking. How would you add ground level retail, keep adequate parking, and keep costs in line? Informed ideas out there?
I am not advocating "more street level retail" since the market can't really bare it. The building needs a liner space along both streets that can be flexible and can change over time, based on the market. Could be residential, office or retail. Yes, that impacts the parking garage arrangement, so they will need to adjust the building to meet their parking performa.

We must stop focusing on density for density sake. It means nothing if the street level experience is despondent and forces these residents and neighboring residents to prefer their car for local trips. A dense city with a boring, brutal walking experience makes the car a better option than walking.
tower
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:45 am
Location: Midtown

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by tower »

Vancouver has a lot of larger apartment buildings especially in the less commercial part of their downtown that have apartments or condos on the ground floor that open directly to the street (higher levels have their own entrance) Is there something in the US zoning code that prevents this? It usually requires a setback for privacy, but it is a pretty good pedestrian experience.
User avatar
AlbertHammond
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:52 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by AlbertHammond »

tower wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:11 am Vancouver has a lot of larger apartment buildings especially in the less commercial part of their downtown that have apartments or condos on the ground floor that open directly to the street (higher levels have their own entrance) Is there something in the US zoning code that prevents this? It usually requires a setback for privacy, but it is a pretty good pedestrian experience.
Great example. There is nothing that prohibits this in the U.S. (though K.C's archaic code may not allow it). Residential uses on the ground floor are a great way to activate the street. If people fear that no one would rent/buy those units, then they might be designated as "affordable" units.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by flyingember »

missingkc wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:50 pm Can they build on their half of the alley? Are there no setbacks in KC?
There's no alley anymore legally so it's just like building on a lot that just happens to have been expanded to include a vacated alley.

There's no setbacks downtown to play a part.

This is one of the parcels they're building on. They fully own the land that used to be the alley.
Legal Description: 1800 WALNUT MCGEES ADD S 34.5 FT LOT 454 &ALL LOT 455 7 E 1/2 VAC ALY W OF & ADJ BLK 34
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by flyingember »

AlbertHammond wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:17 am
tower wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:11 am Vancouver has a lot of larger apartment buildings especially in the less commercial part of their downtown that have apartments or condos on the ground floor that open directly to the street (higher levels have their own entrance) Is there something in the US zoning code that prevents this? It usually requires a setback for privacy, but it is a pretty good pedestrian experience.
Great example. There is nothing that prohibits this in the U.S. (though K.C's archaic code may not allow it). Residential uses on the ground floor are a great way to activate the street. If people fear that no one would rent/buy those units, then they might be designated as "affordable" units.
Downtown is DC, DX and DR zoning at decreasing densities

As best I can tell zoning allows ground floor residential. Nothing bans it outright. City Club appears to have some units with street facing entrances so that's probably a good sign they're ok.

Multi-unit in residential zoning requires features like the below items for the ground floor which isn't a bad standard.

(1) covered porch or canopy;
(2) transom and sidelight windows;
(3) pilasters and pediment; or
(4) other significant architectural treatment that emphasizes the entrance. (Simple trimaround the doorway does not meet this standard.)
KanzaSphinx
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:21 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by KanzaSphinx »

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.0349076 ... 312!8i6656


Not downtown but still an example of street level residential on a newer and substantial development
User avatar
AlbertHammond
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:52 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by AlbertHammond »

KanzaSphinx wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:21 am https://www.google.com/maps/@39.0349076 ... 312!8i6656


Not downtown but still an example of street level residential on a newer and substantial development
Another great example of what could line the parking garage.
tower
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:45 am
Location: Midtown

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by tower »

flyingember wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:06 am
AlbertHammond wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:17 am
tower wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:11 am Vancouver has a lot of larger apartment buildings especially in the less commercial part of their downtown that have apartments or condos on the ground floor that open directly to the street (higher levels have their own entrance) Is there something in the US zoning code that prevents this? It usually requires a setback for privacy, but it is a pretty good pedestrian experience.
Great example. There is nothing that prohibits this in the U.S. (though K.C's archaic code may not allow it). Residential uses on the ground floor are a great way to activate the street. If people fear that no one would rent/buy those units, then they might be designated as "affordable" units.
Downtown is DC, DX and DR zoning at decreasing densities

As best I can tell zoning allows ground floor residential. Nothing bans it outright. City Club appears to have some units with street facing entrances so that's probably a good sign they're ok.

Multi-unit in residential zoning requires features like the below items for the ground floor which isn't a bad standard.

(1) covered porch or canopy;
(2) transom and sidelight windows;
(3) pilasters and pediment; or
(4) other significant architectural treatment that emphasizes the entrance. (Simple trimaround the doorway does not meet this standard.)
The City Club entrances on Walnut are perfect, i didn't realize they had that. The South Plaza example is good too, but damn that's an ugly building.

Hopefully City Club encourages other downtown developers to include some form of ground floor residential, but the units must not fetch as much because they're pretty rare in the US, as far as I've seen. Historically, that wasn't the case, but elevators changed all of that.
KCMOJoe89
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:22 am

Re: 1800 Walnut

Post by KCMOJoe89 »

Yes, ground floor residential! I always think back to the linked article and the conversation about having retail streets and good residential streets (conversation with pics near the bottom of the article). Makes a lot of sense if done right. I especially like the terrace idea.

https://www.vox.com/2017/6/21/15815524/ ... ies-cities

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CptLScfVYAAzTdO.jpg:large
Post Reply