chingon wrote:Abstaining from participation in the amazon con-game/ad campaign is the only response that would demonstrate vision.
earthling wrote: It overstates that KC has an international airport, which is likely not broad enough for their requirements.
tower wrote:earthling wrote: It overstates that KC has an international airport, which is likely not broad enough for their requirements.
Its pretty indicative of our standing in the competition, which is that we really just satisfy the basic requirements of the RFP, but we're affordable.
Sacramento and KC were included in that list in case they are just checking the boxes and then optimizing for cost, like linear programming. With that methodology, we stand a chance. Otherwise, no way.
ldai_phs wrote:KCMOJoe89 wrote:So will the region make their proposal public now?
We already know a big reason why we lost: we pitched suburban sites in places like Olathe.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests