Downtown Buildings with Activity

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mykn

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by mykn »

Open until 5:30.
User avatar
taxi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2098
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: North End
Contact:

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by taxi »

mykn wrote:Open until 5:30.
Open for dinner... but not supper.
TheBigChuckbowski
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3565
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: Longfellow

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by TheBigChuckbowski »

mykn wrote:Open until 5:30.
Can someone explain to me why restaurants do this? It's got to be costing them money to stay open from 2-5 with very few people eating during those times. Why stay open and then close right before dinner starts?
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by flyingember »

TheBigChuckbowski wrote:
mykn wrote:Open until 5:30.
Can someone explain to me why restaurants do this? It's got to be costing them money to stay open from 2-5 with very few people eating during those times. Why stay open and then close right before dinner starts?
I bet they do next day prep in the afternoon so if they're working they might as well try to make money too
User avatar
smh
Supporter
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:40 pm
Location: Central Loop

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by smh »

I suspect the more correct answer is they just haven't thought it through.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33987
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by KCPowercat »

TheBigChuckbowski wrote:
mykn wrote:Open until 5:30.
Can someone explain to me why restaurants do this? It's got to be costing them money to stay open from 2-5 with very few people eating during those times. Why stay open and then close right before dinner starts?
Catch the office drones who might carry out dinner??? That's my best guess.
User avatar
Demosthenes
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Location: CBD

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by Demosthenes »

KCPowercat wrote:
TheBigChuckbowski wrote:
mykn wrote:Open until 5:30.
Can someone explain to me why restaurants do this? It's got to be costing them money to stay open from 2-5 with very few people eating during those times. Why stay open and then close right before dinner starts?
Catch the office drones who might carry out dinner??? That's my best guess.
Yea that's my guess too, but they might as well stay open til 7 or 8 at least. Just doesn't really seem to make much sense.

I saw this space was being worked on. Definitely glad it is going to be a restaurant, and barbecue is always a good choice. Hope it's good.

They should definitely include large and obvious signage, as we discussed in a recent thread. Could make or break the place.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18191
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by FangKC »

It doesn't have to be large. Just obvious.
droopy
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 4:59 pm

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by droopy »

The signage from the outside so far is too subtle in my opinion. Drove by last night, knew the place was there, and still had a hard time finding their name from the street. All I noticed was a small band of lettering at the top of the windows. Possible I missed something more obvious since I was driving and more focused on not running over pedestrians. That said, it has nice windows and bright lighting to see inside the place.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18191
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by FangKC »

Does anyone know the signage ordinances downtown. Are they really strict? Or do the building owners not want signs hanging on the sides of their buildings?

I can't recall being in a downtown area that so lacked signage at street-level.
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by loftguy »

FangKC wrote:Does anyone know the signage ordinances downtown. Are they really strict? Or do the building owners not want signs hanging on the sides of their buildings?

I can't recall being in a downtown area that so lacked signage at street-level.

For many decades, signage in general and especially signage extending from the façade of a building into a right-of-way has been a hard row to hoe.

Ordinances, regulation, limitation, fees, submittals, reviews and rejection are all part of the norm. Basically you have to put aside a bankroll and then lawyer up in order to gain an encroachment ordinance in order to get a sign over the sidewalk.

Currently a bit more flexible, meaning they might consider it.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20062
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by DaveKCMO »

sounds like a policy change is in order!
User avatar
Demosthenes
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Location: CBD

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by Demosthenes »

How dare people put something so obscene up as signs! Of all the things to try and stop, why signs? A policy change is definitely in order.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by flyingember »

I hereby propose the pro tourism sign ordinance.

Requiring all businesses of public interest defined within to install a sign visible from at least X feet away, or roughly one city block, whichever is longer. This ordinance shall immediatelly go into effect for new construction and be phased in over the next 5 years for existing construction and businesses.
geeman68
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 664
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:22 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by geeman68 »

Line today was really long for the first opening day. Smelled great. Colleague decided to wait in line while I went to Cosentinos for their great chili. Initial report from colleague is that his brisket sandwich was really good and substantial but the sides/chips are somewhat costly. We plan to go back when burnt ends are available.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18191
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by FangKC »

loftguy wrote:
FangKC wrote:Does anyone know the signage ordinances downtown. Are they really strict? Or do the building owners not want signs hanging on the sides of their buildings?

I can't recall being in a downtown area that so lacked signage at street-level.

For many decades, signage in general and especially signage extending from the façade of a building into a right-of-way has been a hard row to hoe.

Ordinances, regulation, limitation, fees, submittals, reviews and rejection are all part of the norm. Basically you have to put aside a bankroll and then lawyer up in order to gain an encroachment ordinance in order to get a sign over the sidewalk.

Currently a bit more flexible, meaning they might consider it.

Well, the sign ordinance makes things even more difficult because of the design of some downtown buildings. 1200 Wyandotte has that inset covered promenade thingy--as does Town Pavilion, the retail space on Baltimore in the garage between 10th and 11th streets, and the City Garage at 12th and Oak. Signage in the windows of these spaces is hard to see.

In the photo below showing retail in the City garage, the signage is tiny. There is all that wasted white space right above the signage that is going to waste, and is basically a facade hiding a garage. The question I ask is: "Do we really, really want our downtown businesses to fail?"

Image

In the photo below, any signage that might be on the building itself, or in the window, is obscured by the trees anyway.

Image

Image
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18191
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by FangKC »

This is an example of where the term "programmed to fail" comes in. As a marketing person, if I were trying to explain to civic leaders in any town I was invited to speak to them about why their downtown retail wasn't successful, these examples would be the first slides I would show them. And I would use the term "programmed to fail."

If I was a business owner looking for a site downtown, I wouldn't touch these spaces with a ten-foot pole.

These spaces are only good for people enrolled in the witness protection program, because no one would ever find them there. :lol:
Last edited by FangKC on Fri Jan 30, 2015 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18191
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by FangKC »

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: Downtown Buildings with Activity

Post by chaglang »

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Post Reply